You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bone marrow donor selection and characterization of MSCs is critical for pre-clinical and clinical cell dose production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-1877-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alpa Trivedi, Byron Miyazawa, Stuart Gibb, Kristen Valanoski, Lindsay Vivona, Maximillian Lin, Daniel Potter, Mars Stone, Philip J. Norris, James Murphy, Sawyer Smith, Martin Schreiber, Shibani Pati |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,566,010
of 23,142,049 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,366
of 4,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,804
of 350,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#68
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,142,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.