↓ Skip to main content

Common patterns of gene regulation associated with Cesarean section and the development of islet autoimmunity – indications of immune cell activation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Common patterns of gene regulation associated with Cesarean section and the development of islet autoimmunity – indications of immune cell activation
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42750-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Laimighofer, R. Lickert, R. Fuerst, F. J. Theis, C. Winkler, E. Bonifacio, A.-G. Ziegler, J. Krumsiek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,090,977
of 13,266,991 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#15,669
of 63,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,050
of 252,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,266,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.