↓ Skip to main content

Common patterns of gene regulation associated with Cesarean section and the development of islet autoimmunity – indications of immune cell activation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Common patterns of gene regulation associated with Cesarean section and the development of islet autoimmunity – indications of immune cell activation
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42750-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Laimighofer, R. Lickert, R. Fuerst, F. J. Theis, C. Winkler, E. Bonifacio, A.-G. Ziegler, J. Krumsiek

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,022,423
of 12,980,854 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#15,087
of 61,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,619
of 202,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.