↓ Skip to main content

Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary interventions for rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006400.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kåre Birger Hagen, Marte Gjeitung Byfuglien, Louise Falzon, Sissel Urke Olsen, Geir Smedslund

Abstract

The question of what potential benefits and harms are associated with certain dietary regimes used in rheumatoid arthritis is an important one for many patients and health care providers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 211 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 19%
Student > Bachelor 39 18%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 23 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 34 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#613,597
of 15,909,307 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,628
of 11,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,718
of 220,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,909,307 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.