You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Talking about treatment benefits, harms, and what matters to patients in radiation oncology: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0800-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laurie Pilote, Luc Côté, Selma Chipenda Dansokho, Émilie Brouillard, Anik M. C. Giguère, France Légaré, Roland Grad, Holly O. Witteman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,193,428
of 23,604,080 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#871
of 2,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,440
of 354,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,604,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,028 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.