You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shima Safikhani, Katharine S. Gries, Jeremiah J. Trudeau, David Reasner, Katja Rüdell, Stephen Joel Coons, Elizabeth Nicole Bush, Jennifer Hanlon, Lucy Abraham, Margaret Vernon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 161 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 21% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 67 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,242,690
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#13
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,821
of 346,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.