↓ Skip to main content

In participatory budgeting we trust? Fairness, tactics and (in)accessibility in participatory governance

Overview of attention for article published in Local Government Studies, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 486)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In participatory budgeting we trust? Fairness, tactics and (in)accessibility in participatory governance
Published in
Local Government Studies, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/03003930.2019.1606798
Authors

Catherine Wilkinson, Jo Briggs, Karen Salt, John Vines, Emma Flynn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 22%
Design 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,543,744
of 16,295,273 outputs
Outputs from Local Government Studies
#35
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,618
of 272,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Local Government Studies
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,295,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.