↓ Skip to main content

Global warming has increased global economic inequality

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
101 news outlets
blogs
21 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
929 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
8 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
390 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global warming has increased global economic inequality
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, April 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1816020116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Marshall Burke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 929 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 390 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 18%
Student > Master 65 17%
Researcher 59 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 66 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 61 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 41 11%
Social Sciences 38 10%
Engineering 29 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 7%
Other 95 24%
Unknown 97 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1564. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,656
of 15,882,393 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#107
of 86,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77
of 271,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#7
of 1,030 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,882,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,030 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.