↓ Skip to main content

Gut microbiome-derived phenyl sulfate contributes to albuminuria in diabetic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Gut microbiome-derived phenyl sulfate contributes to albuminuria in diabetic kidney disease
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09735-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koichi Kikuchi, Daisuke Saigusa, Yoshitomi Kanemitsu, Yotaro Matsumoto, Paxton Thanai, Naoto Suzuki, Koki Mise, Hiroaki Yamaguchi, Tomohiro Nakamura, Kei Asaji, Chikahisa Mukawa, Hiroki Tsukamoto, Toshihiro Sato, Yoshitsugu Oikawa, Tomoyuki Iwasaki, Yuji Oe, Tomoya Tsukimi, Noriko N. Fukuda, Hsin-Jung HO, Fumika Nanto-Hara, Jiro Ogura, Ritsumi Saito, Shizuko Nagao, Yusuke Ohsaki, Satoshi Shimada, Takehiro Suzuki, Takafumi Toyohara, Eikan Mishima, Hisato Shima, Yasutoshi Akiyama, Yukako Akiyama, Mariko Ichijo, Tetsuro Matsuhashi, Akihiro Matsuo, Yoshiaki Ogata, Ching-Chin Yang, Chitose Suzuki, Matthew C. Breeggemann, Jurgen Heymann, Miho Shimizu, Susumu Ogawa, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Takashi Suzuki, Yuji Owada, Shigeo Kure, Nariyasu Mano, Tomoyoshi Soga, Takashi Wada, Jeffrey B. Kopp, Shinji Fukuda, Atsushi Hozawa, Masayuki Yamamoto, Sadayoshi Ito, Jun Wada, Yoshihisa Tomioka, Takaaki Abe

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Other 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Unspecified 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 17 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Other 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#375,583
of 13,590,700 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#6,494
of 24,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,704
of 255,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,590,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them