You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Primary cilia regulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell specification through Notch signaling in zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09403-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhibin Liu, Haiqing Tu, Yunsi Kang, Yuanyuan Xue, Dongyuan Ma, Chengtian Zhao, Huiyan Li, Lu Wang, Feng Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,918,164
of 23,702,491 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#23,890
of 49,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,833
of 351,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#663
of 1,310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,702,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.