↓ Skip to main content

Machine behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
446 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Machine behaviour
Published in
Nature, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iyad Rahwan, Manuel Cebrian, Nick Obradovich, Josh Bongard, Jean-François Bonnefon, Cynthia Breazeal, Jacob W. Crandall, Nicholas A. Christakis, Iain D. Couzin, Matthew O. Jackson, Nicholas R. Jennings, Ece Kamar, Isabel M. Kloumann, Hugo Larochelle, David Lazer, Richard McElreath, Alan Mislove, David C. Parkes, Alex ‘Sandy’ Pentland, Margaret E. Roberts, Azim Shariff, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Michael Wellman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,015 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1331 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 327 25%
Researcher 181 14%
Student > Master 159 12%
Student > Bachelor 81 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 78 6%
Other 256 19%
Unknown 249 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 203 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 126 9%
Social Sciences 105 8%
Engineering 96 7%
Psychology 76 6%
Other 384 29%
Unknown 341 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 938. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2023.
All research outputs
#14,683
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,594
of 91,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327
of 349,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#44
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.