↓ Skip to main content

Different response of bacteria, archaea and fungi to process parameters in nine full‐scale anaerobic digesters

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Biotechnology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different response of bacteria, archaea and fungi to process parameters in nine full‐scale anaerobic digesters
Published in
Microbial Biotechnology, April 2019
DOI 10.1111/1751-7915.13409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne G. Langer, Christina Gabris, Daniel Einfalt, Bernd Wemheuer, Marian Kazda, Frank R. Bengelsdorf

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,992,573
of 12,980,854 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Biotechnology
#233
of 643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,846
of 193,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Biotechnology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,980,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.