↓ Skip to main content

Consensus embedding: theory, algorithms and application to segmentation and classification of biomedical data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus embedding: theory, algorithms and application to segmentation and classification of biomedical data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satish Viswanath, Anant Madabhushi

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction (DR) enables the construction of a lower dimensional space (embedding) from a higher dimensional feature space while preserving object-class discriminability. However several popular DR approaches suffer from sensitivity to choice of parameters and/or presence of noise in the data. In this paper, we present a novel DR technique known as consensus embedding that aims to overcome these problems by generating and combining multiple low-dimensional embeddings, hence exploiting the variance among them in a manner similar to ensemble classifier schemes such as Bagging. We demonstrate theoretical properties of consensus embedding which show that it will result in a single stable embedding solution that preserves information more accurately as compared to any individual embedding (generated via DR schemes such as Principal Component Analysis, Graph Embedding, or Locally Linear Embedding). Intelligent sub-sampling (via mean-shift) and code parallelization are utilized to provide for an efficient implementation of the scheme.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 5%
France 2 4%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Engineering 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#13,285,398
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,166
of 7,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,791
of 247,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#36
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.