↓ Skip to main content

Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Overview of attention for article published in Radiation Oncology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neoadjuvant versus definitive chemoradiation in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
Published in
Radiation Oncology, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13014-019-1270-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan Münch, Steffi U. Pigorsch, Michal Devečka, Hendrik Dapper, Marcus Feith, Helmut Friess, Wilko Weichert, Moritz Jesinghaus, Rickmer Braren, Stephanie E. Combs, Daniel Habermehl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#10,841,826
of 13,606,441 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,021
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,698
of 255,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,606,441 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them