You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Coding Exon-Structure Aware Realigner (CESAR): Utilizing Genome Alignments for Comparative Gene Annotation
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
Gene Prediction
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-9172-3, 978-1-4939-9173-0
|
| Authors |
Virag Sharma, Michael Hiller, V Sharma, M Hiller, Sharma, Virag, Hiller, Michael |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 31% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,639,941
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#458
of 14,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,866
of 449,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,073 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.