You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wilma E Waterlander, Ingrid HM Steenhuis, Michiel R de Boer, Albertine J Schuit, Jacob C Seidell |
| Abstract |
Lowering the price of fruit and vegetables is a promising strategy in stimulating the purchase of those foods. However, the true effects of this strategy are not well studied and it is unclear how the money saved is spent. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables on food purchases in a supermarket environment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 223 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 13% |
| Psychology | 30 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 25% |
| Unknown | 55 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,543,186
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#535
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,458
of 254,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.