↓ Skip to main content

Disagreeable Rhetoric, Shaming, and the Strategy of Dissenting on the U.S. Supreme Court

Overview of attention for article published in Justice System Journal, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Disagreeable Rhetoric, Shaming, and the Strategy of Dissenting on the U.S. Supreme Court
Published in
Justice System Journal, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/0098261x.2019.1598901
Authors

Robert J. Hume

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,808,787
of 15,542,565 outputs
Outputs from Justice System Journal
#22
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,224
of 269,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Justice System Journal
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.