↓ Skip to main content

Genetic defects in human azoospermia

Overview of attention for article published in Basic and Clinical Andrology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic defects in human azoospermia
Published in
Basic and Clinical Andrology, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12610-019-0086-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farah Ghieh, Valérie Mitchell, Béatrice Mandon-Pepin, François Vialard

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 67%
Linguistics 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#11,679,633
of 14,730,848 outputs
Outputs from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#41
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,118
of 265,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,730,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them