↓ Skip to main content

Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term non-pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004095.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan L Norris, Xuanping Zhang, Alison Avenell, Edward Gregg, Tamara Brown, Christopher H Schmid, Joseph Lau

Abstract

Most persons with type 2 diabetes are overweight and obesity worsens the metabolic and physiologic abnormalities associated with diabetes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 7%
India 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 37 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 100%
Researcher 33 77%
Student > Bachelor 27 63%
Unspecified 23 53%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 47%
Other 54 126%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 205%
Unspecified 33 77%
Psychology 20 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Other 31 72%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,656,871
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,744
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,449
of 217,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#344
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.