The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long‐term non‐pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004095.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan L Norris, Xuanping Zhang, Alison Avenell, Edward Gregg, Tamara Brown, Christopher H Schmid, Joseph Lau |
Abstract |
Most persons with type 2 diabetes are overweight and obesity worsens the metabolic and physiologic abnormalities associated with diabetes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 50% |
Turkey | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 391 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 70 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 50 | 13% |
Researcher | 49 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 10% |
Other | 25 | 6% |
Other | 73 | 18% |
Unknown | 93 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 141 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 10% |
Psychology | 24 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 4% |
Other | 43 | 11% |
Unknown | 118 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2024.
All research outputs
#5,594,702
of 26,222,667 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,741
of 13,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,068
of 67,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,222,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.