↓ Skip to main content

Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 75,817)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
212 news outlets
blogs
27 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
339 tweeters
facebook
22 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1517056113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert E. Kopp, Andrew C. Kemp, Klaus Bittermann, Benjamin P. Horton, Jeffrey P. Donnelly, W. Roland Gehrels, Carling C. Hay, Jerry X. Mitrovica, Eric D. Morrow, Stefan Rahmstorf, Kopp, Robert E, Kemp, Andrew C, Bittermann, Klaus, Horton, Benjamin P, Donnelly, Jeffrey P, Gehrels, W Roland, Hay, Carling C, Mitrovica, Jerry X, Morrow, Eric D, Rahmstorf, Stefan

Abstract

We assess the relationship between temperature and global sea-level (GSL) variability over the Common Era through a statistical metaanalysis of proxy relative sea-level reconstructions and tide-gauge data. GSL rose at 0.1 ± 0.1 mm/y (2σ) over 0-700 CE. A GSL fall of 0.2 ± 0.2 mm/y over 1000-1400 CE is associated with ∼0.2 °C global mean cooling. A significant GSL acceleration began in the 19th century and yielded a 20th century rise that is extremely likely (probability [Formula: see text]) faster than during any of the previous 27 centuries. A semiempirical model calibrated against the GSL reconstruction indicates that, in the absence of anthropogenic climate change, it is extremely likely ([Formula: see text]) that 20th century GSL would have risen by less than 51% of the observed [Formula: see text] cm. The new semiempirical model largely reconciles previous differences between semiempirical 21st century GSL projections and the process model-based projections summarized in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 339 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 5 2%
France 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 231 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 21%
Student > Master 33 13%
Other 21 8%
Professor 20 8%
Other 67 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 96 38%
Environmental Science 56 22%
Unspecified 28 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 8%
Engineering 15 6%
Other 41 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#472
of 11,823,790 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#23
of 75,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26
of 293,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#2
of 1,105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,823,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.