@Comsen21 @wattsupwiththat "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rather
@BellocRaoul @ClemSenechal C'est l'augmentation du niveau des océans au 20ème siècle qui est exceptionnelle depuis près de 3000 ans! https://t.co/4pBvzSen88 https://t.co/n37gB3tx7G
@hueofheather1 @nshaviv "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rather tha
@MatthewWielicki @Daaanvdb @TheDisproof In case you missed it:
@NatalieCarmody @JackRea10822853 Anyone who disputes data without producing any other is too stupid to qualify as sentient. I'm sorry you're so useless. This is the paper and the data source, if you're an honest person you'll apologize. https://t.co/ACth7k
@ManicBeancount @PInstinctx @RogerPielkeJr @wattsupwiththat "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by b
@wolfie_smythe @ClimateRealists "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, ra
@Lindhacker @HenrikHindby Endnu et studie som undersiger dine tosserier https://t.co/qYKmk7DzDa
@SlootLau Ergo: voor de menselijke maatschappij (de afgelopen ca. 6500 jaar) was er bijna NUL zeespiegelstijging tot deze na 1850 van start ging. Zie bijv. https://t.co/7itq8LHha9 https://t.co/tImrQqkKYk
@RogerOfBorg @Peeortsmuff @JustStop_Oil "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +
@FBreject1 @MatthewWielicki @KevinDa11665170 "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm &a
@KotlinWombat @BjornLomborg "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rather
@mgallagher465 @Gizmo20162139 @ccdeditor "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm &
@UnusFr @Echangesclimat @NASAViz @NASA C'est pas la NASA, mais bien tenté https://t.co/DjKGD48KhF
@JonMoseley @NOAAClimate "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rather th
@wideawake_media "20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without GW, GSL in the 20th century would have risen by between −3 cm and +7 cm, rather than the ∼14 cm obs
@DavidJIppolito1 @JunkScience "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rath
@Huddster2 @carsonight @dan_kammen @CNN @IPCC_CH @GavinNewsom "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by
@SteveGott6 @JunkScience "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm & +7 cm, rather th
@JohnBar90074229 @AlexEpstein @RitaPanahi "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm &
@i_johnnylawley @AlexEpstein @KA_Todd19 @algore "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm
@samlong70708373 @ExpandingArctic @JunkScience @MarkSerreze "The 20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by b
@DaddyKnowsBest8 @ZekeCalabrese @JunkScience "The 20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm and +7 cm, rather th
@Netpropheting @WapitiJack @juststrikes007 @TonyClimate @nytimes "20th century rise was faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in 20th century very likely would have risen by
RT @UkraineTrollbot: I do not understand how people can take nonsense such as "semiempirical modeling" seriously. Modeling is NOT science,…
I do not understand how people can take nonsense such as "semiempirical modeling" seriously. Modeling is NOT science, it is a #ClimateScam
@UkraineTrollbot "20th century rise was faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm and +7 cm, rather than the ∼14
@CarnivoreIs @CSA4boogaloo @inflation4boogs @JunkScience "20th century rise was faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3
@blackbarthnews @DonSuth89069583 @JunkScience "20th century rise was extremely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely have risen by between −3
@zauberberg188 Der aktuelle Meerespiegelanstieg ist im Kontext der letzten 3000 Jahre einzigartig. https://t.co/ngkk1o7F6c
@threadreaderapp @ncdave4life SLR isn't constantly increasing since warming was not constant + acceleration is tied to warming. So your abuse of Zervas fails. Same reason why your comparisons to CO2 curves are also deceptive, Burton. https://t.co/gDipTPe6
RT @Faktantarkast10: @ejwwest @PeterDClack There, indeed, is little sea level rise since 1620. The IPCC predicts ~ 30 cm of further sea le…
@ejwwest @PeterDClack There, indeed, is little sea level rise since 1620. The IPCC predicts ~ 30 cm of further sea level rise between 2022 and 2100. The Plymouth Rock will not be inundated by 2100. https://t.co/c9AcVZJ0no https://t.co/YGmTA2KBc9
RT @HelvidiusPrisc: “Check out this scientific study that estimates sea level over the last 3,000 years based on computer modeling by a gro…
“Check out this scientific study that estimates sea level over the last 3,000 years based on computer modeling by a group of people known to force computer models to give them the ‘data’ they want.” —@tachyonspeed55 You can’t make this stuff up. Cc:@Am
@HelvidiusPrisc @sunnysalen @Sarahst66109758 @scottjshapiro Now read carefully: Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era https://t.co/nCx4o2xB8z
Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era | PNAS https://t.co/8Jigsy9xT7
@trading_indian See Kopp et al 2016 - Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era https://t.co/OHQHNGo1QW
@mattsissons25 @ClimateRealists Nope global mean sea level rise is not 1.3mm per year, it is more than twice that and accelerating: https://t.co/7uzzT8xwQh MWP was regional not global. Here is global for that period https://t.co/9056RTtzLh
@jhwalker6751 @ClimateRealists Nope https://t.co/9056RTtzLh The 20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries and https://t.co/wAHAOvCgde
@sfmountainbiker @Greta57027343 @DaveAtherton20 Nope, don't confuse regional with global: https://t.co/7SiPuVvAxT and https://t.co/9056RTtzLh "The 20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries" .
@Juha_the_Great @Bat_Yann @MichaelEMann "20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any 27 previous centuries. Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without GW, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm and +7 cm
Συγχέουν τοπικές με παγκόσμιες τιμές για τη στάθμη της θάλασσας. Δεν υπάρχει κανένας λόγος να θεωρηθεί ότι ο Νείλος είναι αντιπροσωπευτικός για την παγκόσμια τιμή. Έχουμε περισσότερες μετρήσεις για να έχουμε μια πιο πλήρη εικόνα. https://t.co/ZcdYNRUR8K ht
Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era https://t.co/XusKmkdahl
3) To develop semi-empirical estimates of SLR (as I understand it, the SLR that would have occurred without climate change), S21 employs the methods of K16, below. 9/ Temperature-driven global sea-level variability in the Common Era https://t.co/VgQhBaY
@RedaBendisari @fjgrimault @nternisien @aclaireeven @greenpeacefr @Djebbari_JB @JouzelJean @fmbreon Par ailleurs, la montée du niveau des mers depuis le 20ème siècle (amplitude, vitesse) est aussi exceptionnelle par rapport aux estimations des variations a
@GregoryMakles Here is the link directly to that Kopp meta analysis study. I assume you’re familiar with it, already having looked so deeply into this topic... maybe you can tell me what’s wrong with it? https://t.co/35WlSk47HY
@KoeppelRoger "Semiempirical modeling indicates that, without global warming, GSL in the 20th century very likely would have risen by between −3 cm and +7 cm, rather than the ∼14 cm observed. (ca. 20 cm inkl. Beginn 21 Jh.)" https://t.co/p2tJgyO2ZY siehe
@MartinCJanssen @theotherroots "The 20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries." https://t.co/p2tJgyO2ZY
Didn’t look much, did they? I found lots of papers, in a few minutes, like this, showing higher sea levels, all over the World. https://t.co/1AHAZ2AKo9 https://t.co/LERtZicKOc
RT @KeillerDon: Wrong again. At the end of the Younger Dyras, temperature increased by 10C in decades. Who is feeding you this rubbish? h…
Wrong again. At the end of the Younger Dyras, temperature increased by 10C in decades. Who is feeding you this rubbish? https://t.co/Ef3hFhjA0w
@KSulza @david_hanselman @Of_The_Root @Climatehope2 @TheDisproof @GeraldKutney @RushhourP @aSinister @DanielMcDonald4 @quieroserabuela @ScienceNotDogma @dan613 @DanCady @KeillerDon "20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any 27 previous
@MartinCJanssen Meeresspiegelanstieg: siehe z.B. "The 20th century rise was extremely likely faster than during any of the 27 previous centuries." https://t.co/p2tJgyO2ZY
@MaxHeadroom_19 @luccamerel De zeespiegel 'piekte' rond het midden van het Holoceen en is daarna langzaam gaan *dalen*. Sinds ca. 1850 stijgt deze echter en steeds sneller. Hierbij de laatste 2500 jaar uit de publicatie van Kopp et al. 2016: https://t.co/
@firefly17310 @bonpoteofficiel @philippeherlin @GWGoldnadel @IPCC_CH Une rapide recherche me permet de douter de ce que vous affirmez: https://t.co/DPrb6oXFjw Essayez de sourcer vos affirmations où on ne s'en sortira pas. https://t.co/EA3zJaV05W
@FrankChanged @tan123 Modern sea level rise is occurring at the fastest rate by far in nearly 3,000 years (and possibly longer). https://t.co/23zuR35Uha https://t.co/jennKQqAU8 https://t.co/OxJsYpjMdF
Cedric says Stefan Rahmstorf is misleading people. 😲
@JackJsherebkin @DawnTJ90 Nah. The whole meme is misleading. https://t.co/GT5JSuc9JC https://t.co/VnJJTexmcK https://t.co/arNZYYIn4T https://t.co/HnFa0MxdA5 https://t.co/e6JdbJ6RVH
@NeasdenParade @maxim_k This is not what the sciences says, https://t.co/agbrTPGDEo It would not be logical. Sea levels rise when the temperature rises, due to ice melt and thermal expansion. The current warming is as we know, anthropogenic, and therefore
@samui_fitness @FreedomGermain @EcoSenseNow The NOAA article I linked explained how there is indeed an acceleration of sea level rise. For specific papers on the topic there's more than a handful available, here's one: https://t.co/okELQcmOSk
@PieterZijlstra2 Over lange tijdschalen bepaalt de grootte van de ijskappen de zeespiegelhoogte. Er ligt nu ±65m water in opgeslagen, daar kan thermische expansie niet tegenop. Dit paper is misschien interessant, bespreekt de afgelopen 3000yr https://t.co/
@JPlefebvre_ @AstroMikeMerri @EcoSenseNow Try this one: https://t.co/9056RTtzLh and current measurements: https://t.co/VQE1OZiR7U
@OiseauDeFrance @brunepoirson @PAGES_IPO De même, la montée du niveau des mers depuis le début du 20ème siècle est exceptionnelle par rapport aux petites variations des derniers 3000 ans: https://t.co/nuTOICOOhl
RT @TheDisproof: @KersevanRoberto @sarahrimmington @SteveSGoddard @MattTheFish @AgaRNR @yesnicksearcy @chrislhayes How do you like this pap…
@KersevanRoberto @sarahrimmington @SteveSGoddard @MattTheFish @AgaRNR @yesnicksearcy @chrislhayes How do you like this paper roberto: https://t.co/9056RTtzLh
@MichaelEMann @GeorgeDvorsky @Gizmodo Sea level rise is unprecedented, too! From @bobkopp et al.: https://t.co/DgsNrChzJS
3\ Kopp et al. 2016 (https://t.co/X7voKHGMO0) finds that a "significant GSL [global sea-level] acceleration began in the 19th century and yielded a 20th century rise that is extremely likely (probability P ≥ 0.95) faster than during any of the previous 27
@JimFish56837379 @KellyMandelbrot @thewesleyep @HumanProgress "it is likely (P > 0.88) that the observed 20th century GSL rise exceeded the nonanthropogenic counterfactuals by 1950 CE and extremely likely (P ≥ 0.95) that it had done so by 1970 CE " ht
RT @GillesnFio: The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆 https://t…
RT @GillesnFio: The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆 https://t…
RT @GillesnFio: The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆 https://t…
RT @GillesnFio: The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆 https://t…
RT @GillesnFio: The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆 https://t…
The repeated ad nauseam stupidity of posting modeling results as empirical evidence.😳😳😳The stupid never stops.😆😆😆