↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
22 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce Arroll, C Raina Elley, Tana Fishman, Felicity A Goodyear-Smith, Tim Kenealy, Grant Blashki, Ngaire Kerse, Stephen MacGillivray

Abstract

Concern has been expressed about the relevance of secondary care studies to primary care patients specifically about the effectiveness of antidepressant medication. There is a need to review the evidence of only those studies that have been conducted comparing antidepressant efficacy with placebo in primary care-based samples.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
Canada 3 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 211 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 17%
Student > Master 31 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Postgraduate 22 10%
Other 75 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 49%
Psychology 28 12%
Unspecified 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 35 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2019.
All research outputs
#253,637
of 13,090,538 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#667
of 10,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,496
of 213,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,090,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.