You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007954 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce Arroll, C Raina Elley, Tana Fishman, Felicity A Goodyear‐Smith, Tim Kenealy, Grant Blashki, Ngaire Kerse, Stephen MacGillivray |
| Abstract |
Concern has been expressed about the relevance of secondary care studies to primary care patients specifically about the effectiveness of antidepressant medication. There is a need to review the evidence of only those studies that have been conducted comparing antidepressant efficacy with placebo in primary care-based samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 22% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 49% |
| Scientists | 13 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 405 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 12% |
| Researcher | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 85 | 20% |
| Unknown | 100 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 142 | 34% |
| Psychology | 48 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 54 | 13% |
| Unknown | 117 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#200,844
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#341
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#428
of 122,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.