You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
No evidence for spatial variation in predation risk following restricted-area fox culling
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12898-019-0235-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jim-Lino Kämmerle, Sarah Niekrenz, Ilse Storch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 16 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 25 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 79% |
Scientists | 8 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 23% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 40% |
Environmental Science | 13 | 25% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,057,585
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#233
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,963
of 363,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.