↓ Skip to main content

Safety and clinical impact of FEES – results of the FEES-registry

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
67 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety and clinical impact of FEES – results of the FEES-registry
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s42466-019-0021-5
Authors

Rainer Dziewas, Matthias auf dem Brinke, Ulrich Birkmann, Götz Bräuer, Kolja Busch, Franziska Cerra, Renate Damm-Lunau, Juliane Dunkel, Amelie Fellgiebel, Elisabeth Garms, Jörg Glahn, Sandra Hagen, Sophie Held, Christine Helfer, Mirko Hiller, Christina Horn-Schenk, Christoph Kley, Nikolaus Lange, Sriramya Lapa, Christian Ledl, Beate Lindner-Pfleghar, Marion Mertl-Rötzer, Madeleine Müller, Hermann Neugebauer, Duygu Özsucu, Michael Ohms, Markus Perniß, Waltraud Pfeilschifter, Tanja Plass, Christian Roth, Robin Roukens, Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke, Beate Schumann, Julia Schwarze, Kathi Schweikert, Holger Stege, Dirk Theuerkauf, Randall S. Thomas, Ulrich Vahle, Nancy Voigt, Hermann Weber, Cornelius J. Werner, Rainer Wirth, Ingo Wittich, Hartwig Woldag, Tobias Warnecke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Psychology 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2020.
All research outputs
#267,136
of 15,160,400 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,646
of 266,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,160,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them