You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Edible Microorganisms—An Overlooked Technology Option to Counteract Agricultural Expansion
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, May 2019
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||19||79%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||19%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||11%|
|Student > Master||4||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||11%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||8%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 2,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 355,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.