You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001808.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer A Salati, Sebastian J Leathersich, Myfanwy J Williams, Anna Cuthbert, Jorge E Tolosa |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 18% |
Brazil | 1 | 9% |
El Salvador | 1 | 9% |
Russia | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 188 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 15% |
Unknown | 73 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Unknown | 84 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,401,758
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,187
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,334
of 351,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#114
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.