↓ Skip to main content

Living conditions and quality of care in residential units for people with long-term mental illness in Portugal – a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Living conditions and quality of care in residential units for people with long-term mental illness in Portugal – a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0743-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graça Cardoso, Ana Papoila, Gina Tomé, Helen Killaspy, Michael King, José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida

Abstract

As in most European countries, mental health care has shifted from large hospitals to smaller community based settings in Portugal. Our study objectives were to determine: a) the characteristics of users of mental health residential facilities in Portugal; b) the quality of care provided comparing community and hospital units; and c) to investigate associations between quality of care, service and service users' characteristics and experiences of care. All longer term mental health units in Portugal providing on-site staffed support for at least 12 h per day were assessed with the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC), a standardised tool completed by the unit manager. The QuIRC rates seven domains of care (Living Environment, Therapeutic Environment, Treatments and Interventions, Self/Management and Autonomy, Recovery Based Practice, Social Inclusion, and Human Rights). A random sample of service users were interviewed using standardised measures of autonomy, experiences of care and quality of life. Most (60 %) of the 42 units were in Lisbon and surrounding districts with 50 % based in the community and 50 % in hospital settings. They had a mean of 11.5 beds. Service users (n = 278) were mainly men (66.2 %), with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (72.7 %), and a mean age of 49.4 years. Community units scored higher than hospital units on the Living Environment, Treatments and Interventions, and Self-Management and Autonomy domains of the QuIRC. Increased service user age was negatively associated with all but one domain. All QuIRC domains were positively associated with service users' autonomy and experiences of care. Investing in better quality, community based mental health facilities is associated with better outcomes for service users who require longer term support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,216,314
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,824
of 5,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,316
of 303,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#48
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.