↓ Skip to main content

A graph-based analysis for generating geographical context from a historical cadastre in Spain (17th and 18th centuries)

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
A graph-based analysis for generating geographical context from a historical cadastre in Spain (17th and 18th centuries)
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2019.1590269
Authors

Benito Zaragozí, Pablo Giménez-Font, Antonio Belda-Antolí, Alfredo Ramón-Morte

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,216,918
of 13,017,201 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#65
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,172
of 201,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,017,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them