You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Simulation versus real-world performance: a direct comparison of emergency medicine resident resuscitation entrustment scoring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Advances in Simulation, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s41077-019-0099-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristen Weersink, Andrew K. Hall, Jessica Rich, Adam Szulewski, J. Damon Dagnone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 16 | 36% |
United States | 4 | 9% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 48% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 30% |
Scientists | 9 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 15% |
Researcher | 12 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 27% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 46% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Linguistics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,363,105
of 25,365,817 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#51
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,999
of 357,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,365,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.