↓ Skip to main content

IL-4 dependent alternatively-activated macrophages have a distinctive in vivo gene expression phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Immunology, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IL-4 dependent alternatively-activated macrophages have a distinctive in vivo gene expression phenotype
Published in
BMC Immunology, July 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2172-3-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

P'ng Loke, Meera G Nair, John Parkinson, David Guiliano, Mark Blaxter, Judith E Allen

Abstract

"Alternatively-activated" macrophages are found in Th2-mediated inflammatory settings such as nematode infection and allergic pulmonary inflammation. Due in part to a lack of markers, these cells have not been well characterized in vivo and their function remains unknown. We have used murine macrophages elicited by nematode infection (NeM(phi)) as a source of in vivo derived alternatively activated macrophages. Using three distinct yet complementary molecular approaches we have established a gene expression profile of alternatively activated macrophages and identified macrophage genes that are regulated in vivo by IL-4. First, genes abundantly expressed were identified by an expressed sequence tag strategy. Second, an array of 1176 known mouse genes was screened for differential expression between NeM(phi) from wild type or IL-4 deficient mice. Third, a subtractive library was screened to identify novel IL-4 dependent macrophage genes. Differential expression was confirmed by real time RT-PCR analysis. Our data demonstrate that alternatively activated macrophages generated in vivo have a gene expression profile distinct from any macrophage population described to date. Several of the genes we identified, including those most abundantly expressed, have not previously been associated with macrophages and thus this study provides unique new information regarding the phenotype of macrophages found in Th2-mediated, chronic inflammatory settings. Our data also provide additional in vivo evidence for parallels between the inflammatory processes involved in nematode infection and allergy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 143 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Researcher 31 20%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Professor 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 14%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 25 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#62
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,396
of 47,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them