You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using Pseudopotentials within the Interacting Quantum Atoms Approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Physical Chemistry A, June 2009
|
DOI | 10.1021/jp901753p |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Davide Tiana, E. Francisco, M. A. Blanco, A. Martín Pendás |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Professor | 5 | 15% |
Student > Master | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Other | 10 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 22 | 65% |
Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,844,100
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#969
of 9,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,102
of 111,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry A
#11
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,921 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.