↓ Skip to main content

LIMPRINT: A Sociological Perspective on “Chronic Edema”

Overview of attention for article published in Lymphatic Research and Biology, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LIMPRINT: A Sociological Perspective on “Chronic Edema”
Published in
Lymphatic Research and Biology, April 2019
DOI 10.1089/lrb.2018.0082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart Nairn, Eleanor Dring, Aimee Aubeeluck, Isabelle Quéré, Christine Moffatt

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#11,572,301
of 13,022,627 outputs
Outputs from Lymphatic Research and Biology
#121
of 146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,944
of 203,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lymphatic Research and Biology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,022,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.