↓ Skip to main content

Effective capture of circulating tumor cells from an S180-bearing mouse model using electrically charged magnetic nanoparticles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective capture of circulating tumor cells from an S180-bearing mouse model using electrically charged magnetic nanoparticles
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12951-019-0491-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiming Li, Jun Ruan, Xuan Zhuang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 32%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Chemistry 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 15 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,448,024
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#518
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,193
of 349,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#11
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.