↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Brazzelli, Peter AG Sandercock, Francesca M Chappell, Maria Grazia Celani, Enrico Righetti, Nicholas Arestis, Joanna M Wardlaw, Jonathan J Deeks

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 178 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 52 27%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Engineering 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 27 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,686,604
of 15,418,020 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,176
of 11,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,932
of 267,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,418,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.