↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for detection of acute vascular lesions in patients presenting with stroke symptoms
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007424.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Brazzelli, Peter AG Sandercock, Francesca M Chappell, Maria Grazia Celani, Enrico Righetti, Nicholas Arestis, Joanna M Wardlaw, Jonathan J Deeks

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 150 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 20 12%
Other 18 11%
Other 61 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 60%
Unspecified 21 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 16 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,193,679
of 13,601,191 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,834
of 10,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,421
of 265,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,601,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.