You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000005.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberta W Scherer, Patricia Langenberg, Erik von Elm |
Abstract |
Abstracts of presentations at scientific meetings are usually available only in conference proceedings. If subsequent full publication of abstract results is based on the magnitude or direction of study results, publication bias may result. Publication bias, in turn, creates problems for those conducting systematic reviews or relying on the published literature for evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 8 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 170 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 20% |
Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
Other | 44 | 24% |
Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 51% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 14% |
Unknown | 36 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#601,993
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,038
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#940
of 88,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.