↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (I)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (I)
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.49.564
Authors

Setsuko FUJITA

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,723,644
of 13,536,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#158
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,737
of 253,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them