You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pregnant women & vaccines against emerging epidemic threats: Ethics guidance for preparedness, research, and response
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vaccine, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carleigh B. Krubiner, Ruth R. Faden, Ruth A. Karron, Margaret O. Little, Anne D. Lyerly, Jon S. Abramson, Richard H. Beigi, Alejandro R. Cravioto, Anna P. Durbin, Bruce G. Gellin, Swati B. Gupta, David C. Kaslow, Sonali Kochhar, Florencia Luna, Carla Saenz, Jeanne S. Sheffield, Paulina O. Tindana, The PREVENT Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 69% |
| Scientists | 11 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 137 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 14% |
| Unknown | 144 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#240,676
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#238
of 16,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,872
of 364,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#3
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.