↓ Skip to main content

Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between 2014 and 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 608)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
78 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between 2014 and 2017
Published in
Journal of the Intensive Care Society, May 2019
DOI 10.1177/1751143719846432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Wong, Ifor Capel, Manu Malbrain

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,000,166
of 26,363,900 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
#34
of 608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,587
of 368,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,363,900 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.