You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between 2014 and 2017
Journal of the Intensive Care Society, May 2019
Adrian Wong, Ifor Capel, Manu Malbrain
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||50||63%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||12||15%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||6||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||14%|
|Student > Postgraduate||5||14%|
|Student > Master||3||9%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||9||26%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,552,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
of 560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 351,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,552,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.