↓ Skip to main content

Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between 2014 and 2017

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 351)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
57 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between 2014 and 2017
Published in
Journal of the Intensive Care Society, May 2019
DOI 10.1177/1751143719846432
Authors

Adrian Wong, Ifor Capel, Manu Malbrain

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#485,380
of 13,318,908 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
#22
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,467
of 250,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Intensive Care Society
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,318,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.