You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abha Saxena, Peter Horby, John Amuasi, Nic Aagaard, Johannes Köhler, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Emmanuelle Denis, Andreas A. Reis, Raffaella Ravinetto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 12% |
| Belgium | 2 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,209,531
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#85
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,062
of 356,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.