↓ Skip to main content

Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abha Saxena, Peter Horby, John Amuasi, Nic Aagaard, Johannes Köhler, Ehsan Shamsi Gooshki, Emmanuelle Denis, Andreas A. Reis, Raffaella Ravinetto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 26%
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 9 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#739,980
of 15,625,699 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#64
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,101
of 269,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them