↓ Skip to main content

Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Political Philosophy, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 229)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress
Published in
Journal of Political Philosophy, May 2019
DOI 10.1111/jopp.12187
Authors

Agnes Tam

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 40%
Student > Master 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 2 40%
Unspecified 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,208,572
of 13,845,249 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Political Philosophy
#46
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,358
of 260,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Political Philosophy
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,249 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.