↓ Skip to main content

Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
89 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
589 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Adverse Maternal and Infant Outcomes
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2019
DOI 10.1001/jama.2019.3820
Pubmed ID
Authors

LifeCycle Project-Maternal Obesity and Childhood Outcomes Study Group, Ellis Voerman, Susana Santos, Hazel Inskip, Pilar Amiano, Henrique Barros, Marie-Aline Charles, Leda Chatzi, George P. Chrousos, Eva Corpeleijn, Sarah Crozier, Myriam Doyon, Merete Eggesbø, Maria Pia Fantini, Sara Farchi, Francesco Forastiere, Vagelis Georgiu, Davide Gori, Wojciech Hanke, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Barbara Heude, Marie-France Hivert, Daniel Hryhorczuk, Carmen Iñiguez, Anne M. Karvonen, Leanne K. Küpers, Hanna Lagström, Debbie A. Lawlor, Irina Lehmann, Per Magnus, Renata Majewska, Johanna Mäkelä, Yannis Manios, Monique Mommers, Camilla S. Morgen, George Moschonis, Ellen A. Nohr, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen, Emily Oken, Agnieszka Pac, Eleni Papadopoulou, Juha Pekkanen, Costanza Pizzi, Kinga Polanska, Daniela Porta, Lorenzo Richiardi, Sheryl L. Rifas-Shiman, Nel Roeleveld, Luca Ronfani, Ana C. Santos, Marie Standl, Hein Stigum, Camilla Stoltenberg, Elisabeth Thiering, Carel Thijs, Maties Torrent, Tomas Trnovec, Marleen M. H. J. van Gelder, Lenie van Rossem, Andrea von Berg, Martine Vrijheid, Alet Wijga, Oleksandr Zvinchuk, Thorkild I. A. Sørensen, Keith Godfrey, Vincent W. V. Jaddoe, Romy Gaillard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 589 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 12%
Student > Bachelor 53 9%
Researcher 51 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 95 16%
Unknown 249 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 4%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 48 8%
Unknown 277 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#178,719
of 26,069,033 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,557
of 37,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,519
of 367,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#61
of 376 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,069,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 376 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.