↓ Skip to main content

Map visualization of groundwater withdrawals at the sub-basin scale

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Map visualization of groundwater withdrawals at the sub-basin scale
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10040-016-1379-x
Authors

Daniel J. Goode

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,378,089
of 12,225,271 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#88
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,635
of 289,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,225,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.