↓ Skip to main content

Identification of plasma binding proteins for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine Journal, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of plasma binding proteins for glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
Published in
Endocrine Journal, January 2019
DOI 10.1507/endocrj.ej18-0472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayako Hoshiyama, Kazumi Fujimoto, Ryo Konno, Sayaka Sasaki, Akari Momozono, Yoshio Kodera, Masayoshi Shichiri

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,366,284
of 13,347,801 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine Journal
#316
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,315
of 249,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,347,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them