↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary parallelisms of pectoral and pelvic network-anatomy from fins to limbs

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
69 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
Title
Evolutionary parallelisms of pectoral and pelvic network-anatomy from fins to limbs
Published in
Science Advances, May 2019
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.aau7459
Pubmed ID
Authors

Borja Esteve-Altava, Stephanie E. Pierce, Julia L. Molnar, Peter Johnston, Rui Diogo, John R. Hutchinson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#170,507
of 12,986,263 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#956
of 2,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,505
of 180,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#38
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,986,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 124.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.