↓ Skip to main content

Psychological Sleep Interventions for Migraine and Tension-Type Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychological Sleep Interventions for Migraine and Tension-Type Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-42785-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel P. Sullivan, Paul R. Martin, Mark J. Boschen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 20%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 42 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Neuroscience 8 8%
Psychology 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 46 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#585,419
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#6,444
of 140,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,132
of 363,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#163
of 3,283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.