↓ Skip to main content

Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
50 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
72 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations
Published in
PLoS ONE, May 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0216643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Schlosser, Terje Sparby, Sebastjan Vörös, Rebecca Jones, Natalie L. Marchant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 9 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 25 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 489. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#26,309
of 16,614,363 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#512
of 161,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#711
of 271,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#4
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,614,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.