↓ Skip to main content

Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
76 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unpleasant meditation-related experiences in regular meditators: Prevalence, predictors, and conceptual considerations
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0216643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Schlosser, Terje Sparby, Sebastjan Vörös, Rebecca Jones, Natalie L. Marchant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 226 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Other 12 5%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 67 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 30%
Neuroscience 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 76 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 707. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2023.
All research outputs
#29,290
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#496
of 223,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#578
of 364,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#7
of 2,829 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,829 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.