You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
But her emails! How journalistic preferences shaped election coverage in 2016
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1464884919845459 |
| Authors |
Kathleen Searles, Kevin K Banda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Georgia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 28 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 17 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 56% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,170,374
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from Journalism
#113
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,062
of 364,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.