↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Environmental Genomics (MEG)

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Microbial Environmental Genomics (MEG)'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 "Deciphering Archaeal Communities" Omics Tools in the Study of Archaeal Communities.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Investigating the Endobacteria Which Thrive in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 GenoSol Platform: A Logistic and Technical Platform for Conserving and Exploring Soil Microbial Diversity.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Sample Preparation for Fungal Community Analysis by High-Throughput Sequencing of Barcode Amplicons
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fungal Communities in Soils: Soil Organic Matter Degradation.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 DNA-Based Characterization and Identification of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Species.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Molecular Identification of Soil Eukaryotes and Focused Approaches Targeting Protist and Faunal Groups Using High-Throughput Metabarcoding.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Identification and In Situ Distribution of a Fungal Gene Marker: The Mating Type Genes of the Black Truffle
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Stable-Isotope Probing RNA to Study Plant/Fungus Interactions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Targeted Gene Capture by Hybridization to Illuminate Ecosystem Functioning.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Hybridization of Environmental Microbial Community Nucleic Acids by GeoChip.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Reconstruction of Transformation Processes Catalyzed by the Soil Microbiome Using Metagenomic Approaches.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 MG-RAST, a Metagenomics Service for Analysis of Microbial Community Structure and Function.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Active Methylotrophic Communities: When DNA-SIP Meets High-Throughput Technologies.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Functional Metagenomics: Construction and High-Throughput Screening of Fosmid Libraries for Discovery of Novel Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Metatranscriptomics of Soil Eukaryotic Communities
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Analysis of Ancient DNA in Microbial Ecology.
Attention for Chapter 1: "Deciphering Archaeal Communities" Omics Tools in the Study of Archaeal Communities.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
"Deciphering Archaeal Communities" Omics Tools in the Study of Archaeal Communities.
Chapter number 1
Book title
Microbial Environmental Genomics (MEG)
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3369-3_1
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3367-9, 978-1-4939-3369-3
Authors

Pašić, Lejla, Martin-Cuadrado, Ana-Belen, López-García, Purificación, Lejla Pašić, Ana-Belen Martin-Cuadrado, Purificación López-García

Editors

Francis Martin, Stephane Uroz

Abstract

Archaea constitute one of the three recognized phylogenetic groups of organisms living on the planet, and the latest to be discovered. Most Archaea resist cultivation and are studied using molecular methods. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and metagenomic approaches have been key in uncovering hitherto unknown archaeal diversity, their metabolic potential, and have even provided an insight into genomes of a number of uncultivated members of this group. Here, we summarize protocols describing sampling, molecular, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic analyses as well as bioinformatics approaches that have proved useful for the study of archaea in natural samples.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,838,332
of 11,430,746 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,296
of 7,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,115
of 341,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#294
of 1,168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,430,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,834 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.