↓ Skip to main content

Not all who wander are lost: Improving spatial protection for large pelagic fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Marine Policy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 1,881)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
95 tweeters
Title
Not all who wander are lost: Improving spatial protection for large pelagic fishes
Published in
Marine Policy, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.04.013
Authors

Kristina Boerder, Laurenne Schiller, Boris Worm

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2019.
All research outputs
#198,321
of 12,986,305 outputs
Outputs from Marine Policy
#37
of 1,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,218
of 178,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Policy
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,986,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.