↓ Skip to main content

Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in Ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
11 X users
patent
21 patents
wikipedia
42 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Gender-Specific Reproductive Tissue in Ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex
Published in
Science, June 2005
DOI 10.1126/science.1112158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary H. Schweitzer, Jennifer L. Wittmeyer, John R. Horner

Abstract

Unambiguous indicators of gender in dinosaurs are usually lost during fossilization, along with other aspects of soft tissue anatomy. We report the presence of endosteally derived bone tissues lining the interior marrow cavities of portions of Tyrannosaurus rex (Museum of the Rockies specimen number 1125) hindlimb elements, and we hypothesize that these tissues are homologous to specialized avian tissues known as medullary bone. Because medullary bone is unique to female birds, its discovery in extinct dinosaurs solidifies the link between dinosaurs and birds, suggests similar reproductive strategies, and provides an objective means of gender differentiation in dinosaurs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Argentina 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 190 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Professor 12 6%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 73 35%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 29 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 196. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#201,542
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,647
of 80,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194
of 67,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#10
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.