You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000036.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nancy J Preston, Morag C Farquhar, Catherine E Walshe, Clare Stevinson, Gail Ewing, Lynn A Calman, Sorrel Burden, Christine Brown Wilson, Jane B Hopkinson, Chris Todd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 61% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Gambia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 216 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 10% |
Researcher | 13 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 36 | 17% |
Unknown | 78 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 16% |
Psychology | 12 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
Other | 25 | 11% |
Unknown | 85 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,866,378
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,994
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,740
of 312,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.